You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Vibration‐Induced Deagglomeration and Shear‐Induced Alignment of Carbon Nanotubes in Air
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advanced Functional Materials, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/adfm.201402976 |
| Authors |
Morteza Miansari, Aisha Qi, Leslie Y. Yeo, James R. Friend |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 46 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 27% |
| Researcher | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 21% |
| Unknown | 6 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 17 | 35% |
| Materials Science | 10 | 21% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2015.
All research outputs
#4,895,003
of 24,577,646 outputs
Outputs from Advanced Functional Materials
#1,904
of 10,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,392
of 364,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advanced Functional Materials
#21
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,577,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,855 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.