↓ Skip to main content

Koebner’s phenomenon as a rare mechanism of acute myeloid leukemia dissemination: report of two cases with a brief overview

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Koebner’s phenomenon as a rare mechanism of acute myeloid leukemia dissemination: report of two cases with a brief overview
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, September 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00520-010-1012-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Tendas, Pasquale Niscola, Stefano Fratoni, Luca Cupelli, Luciana Morino, Benedetta Neri, Micaela Ales, Laura Scaramucci, Marco Giovannini, Rosanna Barbati, Teresa Dentamaro, Paolo de Fabritiis

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2019.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#1,862
of 4,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,152
of 98,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#9
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.