↓ Skip to main content

The role of hernia sac ligation in postoperative pain in patients with elective tension-free indirect inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized study

Overview of attention for article published in Hernia, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
The role of hernia sac ligation in postoperative pain in patients with elective tension-free indirect inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized study
Published in
Hernia, June 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10029-007-0249-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Delikoukos, L. Lavant, G. Hlias, K. Palogos, D. Gikas

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 13%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 13 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 61%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2012.
All research outputs
#8,880,246
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Hernia
#457
of 1,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,978
of 81,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hernia
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,310 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them