↓ Skip to main content

Scaling relations for 2D-percolation

Overview of attention for article published in Communications in Mathematical Physics, March 1987
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
162 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Scaling relations for 2D-percolation
Published in
Communications in Mathematical Physics, March 1987
DOI 10.1007/bf01205674
Authors

Harry Kesten

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Russia 1 4%
Germany 1 4%
France 1 4%
Unknown 24 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 14%
Professor 2 7%
Lecturer 2 7%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 9 32%
Physics and Astronomy 9 32%
Engineering 2 7%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 3 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Communications in Mathematical Physics
#367
of 2,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,173
of 11,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Communications in Mathematical Physics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,508 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them