↓ Skip to main content

The relationship between female sexual function index domains and premature ejaculation

Overview of attention for article published in Geriatric Nephrology and Urology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
The relationship between female sexual function index domains and premature ejaculation
Published in
Geriatric Nephrology and Urology, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11255-018-1832-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lütfi Canat, Recep Burak Değirmentepe, Hasan Anıl Atalay, İlter Alkan, Sait Özbir, Mehmet Gökhan Çulha, Alper Ötünçtemur

Abstract

The aim of this prospective, observational study was to investigate the relationship between premature ejaculation (PE) and female sexual response cycle, using the female sexual function index (FSFI). The FSFI evaluates female sexual function in six domains: desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain. All men were considered to have PE if they fulfilled the criteria of the second Ad Hoc International Society for Sexual Medicine (ISSM) Committee. All men were also assessed by the Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (PEDT) and intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) using stopwatch which was held by the partner. All women completed the FSFI. A total of 181 couples who had regular sexual intercourse with one partner for the past 6 months were enrolled the study. By the definition of ISSM Committee, there were 117 men with PE and 64 men without PE. Partners of men with PE had significantly lower total FSFI scores than did partners of men without PE (21.8 ± 3.5 for PE and 26.4 ± 3.1 for non-PE, p < 0.001). Moreover, all the domains of the FSFI scoring system were separately associated with PE. According to the mean FSFI scores, the 48.43% of women had sexual dysfunction in the non-PE group, and all women had sexual dysfunction in PE group. PE is associated with female sexual dysfunction and all of the female sexual dysfunction domains, as determined by FSFI scores.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 13%
Lecturer 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Other 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 6 25%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 21%
Psychology 3 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2018.
All research outputs
#4,762,265
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Geriatric Nephrology and Urology
#157
of 1,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,263
of 344,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geriatric Nephrology and Urology
#7
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,493 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.