↓ Skip to main content

Parkinson's Disease: Patients’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Interest in Genetic Counseling

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Genetic Counseling, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Parkinson's Disease: Patients’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Interest in Genetic Counseling
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10897-018-0239-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristin A. Maloney, Dina S. Alaeddin, Rainer von Coelln, Shannan Dixon, Lisa M. Shulman, Katrina Schrader, Yue Guan

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the genetics knowledge of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), and to explore their attitudes on genetic testing and interest in genetic counseling. We surveyed 158 patients from the University of Maryland Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Center. Patients averaged a score of 63% on general genetics knowledge and 73% on PD genetics knowledge. Participants had an overall positive attitude toward genetic testing: 80% believed that the use of genetic tests among people should be promoted, and 83% would undertake genetic test for PD if it was available. Patients reported a high interest to discuss the benefits, risks, and impacts of genetic testing for PD (mean sum score = 26, range = 9-35), and 43% patients expressed interest in meeting with a genetic counselor. Multivariate regression analysis showed that patients who had more positive attitudes toward genetic testing for PD were more interested in meeting with a genetic counselor (β = 0.6, p < 0.001). This study is the first to demonstrate an interest in genetic counseling among patients with PD. Our findings demonstrate a new niche for genetic counselors to support patients in clarifying gaps or misconceptions in knowledge about PD genetics as well as the possible risks, benefits, and limitations of genetic testing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Researcher 4 10%
Other 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 15 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 14%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Computer Science 2 5%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 13 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,232,623
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#469
of 1,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,873
of 331,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#20
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.