| Title |
Spigelian Hernias: Repair and Outcome for 81 Patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Surgery, January 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00268-002-6605-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David W. Larson, David R. Farley |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 33 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 26% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 21% |
| Unknown | 4 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 71% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,937,113
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#424
of 4,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,652
of 122,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them