↓ Skip to main content

Surgical treatment of large vestibular schwannomas in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2: outcomes on facial nerve function and hearing preservation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Surgical treatment of large vestibular schwannomas in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2: outcomes on facial nerve function and hearing preservation
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11060-018-2812-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fu Zhao, Bo Wang, Zhijun Yang, Qiangyi Zhou, Peng Li, Xingchao Wang, Jing Zhang, Junting Zhang, Pinan Liu

Abstract

Surgical treatment of vestibular schwannoma (VS) in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) along with functional preservation of cranial nerves is challenging. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of hearing and facial nerve function in patients with NF2 who underwent large-size VS (> 2 cm) surgery. From 2006 to 2016, one hundred and forty NF2 patients were included with 149 large-size VS resections using retrosigmoid approach. Hearing function was classified according to the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) criteria. Preoperative and one-year postoperative facial nerve function were both assessed using the House-Brackmann (H-B) grading scale. A multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify preoperative predictors for facial function outcomes. No operative death we noted. Total tumor removal was achieved in 82.6% of the operated VSs. The anatomical integrity of the facial nerve was preserved in 67.8% of surgeries. Good facial nerve function (H-B Grades I-III) was maintained in 49.6% of patients at 12 months after surgery. Tumor size larger than 3 cm and preoperative facial weakness related with worse outcome of facial nerve function (P < 0.001; for both). Hearing preservation surgeries were attempted in 31 ears. Class B or C hearing according to the AAO-HNS criteria was maintained in 7 ears (22.5%), and measurable hearing was maintained 11 ears (35.5%). It is challenging to maintain hearing and facial nerve function in NF2 patients with large VSs. Early surgical intervention is an appropriate choice to decrease the risk of neurological functions deficit.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 18%
Student > Master 5 15%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 8 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 35%
Neuroscience 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2019.
All research outputs
#14,060,178
of 24,615,949 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#1,730
of 3,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,022
of 335,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#34
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,615,949 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,145 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.