| Title |
The effect of DTT in protein preparations for proteomic analysis: Removal of a highly abundant plant enzyme, ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Plant Biology, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf03036130 |
| Authors |
Jin-Hwan Cho, Heeyoun Hwang, Man-Ho Cho, Yong-Kook Kwon, Jong-Seong Jeon, Seong Hee Bhoo, Tae-Ryong Hahn |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 28% |
| Researcher | 6 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 20% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 40% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,547,176
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Plant Biology
#20
of 100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,727
of 82,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Plant Biology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them