↓ Skip to main content

Cutaneous neural activity and endothelial involvement in cold-induced vasodilatation

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Cutaneous neural activity and endothelial involvement in cold-induced vasodilatation
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00421-018-3832-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gary J. Hodges, Matthew M. Mallette, Stephen S. Cheung

Abstract

Whether sympathetic withdrawal or endothelial dilators such as nitric oxide (NO) contributes to cold-induced vasodilation (CIVD) events is unclear. We measured blood flow and finger skin temperature (Tfinger) of the index finger in nine participants during hand immersion in a water bath at 35 °C for 30 min, then at 8 °C for 30 min. Data were binned into 10 s averages for the entire 60 min protocol for laser-Doppler flux (LDF) and Tfinger. At baseline, Tfingerwas 35.3 ± 0.2 °C and LDF was 227 ± 28 PU. During hand cooling, minimum Tfingerwas 10.9 ± 0.4 °C and LDF was 15 ± 4 PU. All participants exhibited at least one CIVD event (Tfingerincrease ≥ 1 °C), with a mean peak Tfinger13.2 ± 0.8 °C and a corresponding peak LDF of 116 ± 34 PU. A Morlet mother wavelet was then used to perform wavelet analysis on the LDF signal, with frequency ranges of 0.005-0.01 Hz (endothelial NO-independent), 0.01-0.02 Hz (endothelial NO-dependent), and 0.02-0.05 Hz (neurogenic). The synchronicity of wavelet fluctuations with rising LDF coincident with CIVD events was then quantified using Auto-regressive Integrated Moving Average time-series analysis. Fluctuations in neural activity were strongly synchronized in real time with increasing LDF (stationary-r2 = 0.73 and Ljung-box statistic > 0.05), while endothelial activities were only moderately synchronized (NO-independent r2 = 0.15, > 0.05; NO dependent r2 = 0.16, > 0.05). We conclude that there is a direct, real-time correlation of LDF responses with neural activity but not endothelial-mediated mechanisms. Importantly, it seems that neural activity is consistently reduced prior to CIVD, suggesting that sympathetic withdrawal directly contributes to CIVD onset.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 21%
Researcher 3 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 26%
Sports and Recreations 4 21%
Philosophy 1 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,852,306
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1,981
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,406
of 346,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#35
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.