↓ Skip to main content

Vacuum energy for Yang-Mills fields inRd×S1: One-loop, two-loop, and beyond

Overview of attention for article published in Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields, March 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Vacuum energy for Yang-Mills fields inRd×S1: One-loop, two-loop, and beyond
Published in
Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields, March 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf01483877
Authors

K. Shiraishi, S. Hirenzaki

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Other 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 3 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2018.
All research outputs
#19,941,677
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields
#159
of 172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,972
of 17,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 172 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.