↓ Skip to main content

Biosynthesis of cobalamin (vitamin B12): a bacterial conundrum

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, December 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
179 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
254 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Biosynthesis of cobalamin (vitamin B12): a bacterial conundrum
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, December 2000
DOI 10.1007/pl00000670
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. Raux, H. L. Schubert, M. J. Warren*

Abstract

The biosynthesis of cobalamin (vitamin B12) is described, revealing how the concerted action of around 30 enzyme-mediated steps results in the synthesis of one of Nature's most structurally complex 'small molecules'. The plethora of genome sequences has meant that bacteria capable of cobalamin synthesis can be easily identified and their biosynthetic genes compared. Whereas only a few years ago cobalamin synthesis was thought to occur by one of two routes, there are apparently a number of variations on these two pathways, where the major differences seem to be concerned with the process of ring contraction. A comparison of what is currently known about these pathways is presented. Finally, the process of cobalt chelation is discussed and the structure/function of the cobalt chelatase associated with the oxygen-independent pathway (CbiK) is described.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 246 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 24%
Researcher 41 16%
Student > Master 32 13%
Student > Bachelor 31 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 39 15%
Unknown 36 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 94 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 19%
Chemistry 18 7%
Environmental Science 16 6%
Engineering 8 3%
Other 27 11%
Unknown 42 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2018.
All research outputs
#7,538,708
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#1,944
of 5,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,954
of 115,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#12
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.