↓ Skip to main content

Strategies in detection of the primary tumour in anti-Yo associated paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, February 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Strategies in detection of the primary tumour in anti-Yo associated paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration
Published in
Journal of Neurology, February 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00415-005-0635-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Markus Frings, Gerald Antoch, Philipp Knorn, Lutz Freudenberg, Ulrich Bier, Dagmar Timmann, Matthias Maschke

Abstract

In patients with anti-Yo associated paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration (PCD) neurological symptoms precede the diagnosis of the underlying cancer in about 60%. Ovarian carcinoma, breast cancer and other gynaecological malignancies are most frequently found as causative malignancies. Antitumour treatment should be applied in an early stage of disease. The identification of the tumour is a diagnostic challenge in many of these patients. In the first of two patients reported here a pelvic tumour was suggested after detection of a pathological lymph node and elevated tumour markers. The intraoperative findings appeared macroscopically normal during ovariectomy with adnexectomy. Not until microscopic examination of the resected tissue was performed was a tubal adenocarcinoma found. If intrapelvic gynaecological tumours are suspected a deliberate surgical exploration seems to be justified, but only after an intensive diagnostic investigation. To search for the underlying cancer in patients with paraneoplastic neurological disorders successive CT and [18F]-FDG-PET are widely recommended. Instead of this in the second reported patient whole-body dual-modality PET/CT was performed revealing enhanced uptake in three regions of the left thorax. By combining function and anatomy PET/CT was able to localise the lesions and characterise them as lymph node metastases of breast cancer. Diagnosis could be confirmed by subsequently executed needle biopsy. PET/CT seems to be highly applicable in the investigation of paraneoplastic disorders with unknown primary cancer. It may help in guidance of needle biopsy or to optimise the results of deliberate surgery and it provides whole-body tumour staging in a single session with higher diagnostic accuracy than PET alone.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Mexico 1 4%
Poland 1 4%
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 19 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 17%
Professor 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Librarian 2 9%
Other 6 26%
Unknown 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 61%
Neuroscience 3 13%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 2 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2016.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#1,774
of 4,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,519
of 141,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#12
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.