↓ Skip to main content

Aerosolized Intraperitoneal Local Anesthetic for Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized, Double‐Blinded, Placebo‐Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aerosolized Intraperitoneal Local Anesthetic for Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized, Double‐Blinded, Placebo‐Controlled Trial
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00268-015-2973-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ailbhe M. McDermott, Kah Hoong Chang, Kelly Mieske, Peter F. McAnena, Brian Kinirons, Abdelaly Abeidi, Brian H. Harte, Michael J. Kerin, Oliver J. McAnena

Abstract

Postoperative pain remains a significant challenge following laparoscopy. Aerosolized intraperitoneal local anesthetic (AILA) is a novel method to deliver local anesthetic. The aim was to evaluate aerosolized ropivacaine in pain management following laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) and cholecystectomy (LC).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 3%
Unknown 37 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Unspecified 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 10 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2016.
All research outputs
#15,705,568
of 23,339,727 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#3,094
of 4,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,713
of 354,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#26
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,339,727 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.