↓ Skip to main content

Genetics and epigenetics of circadian rhythms and their potential roles in neuropsychiatric disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroscience Bulletin, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Genetics and epigenetics of circadian rhythms and their potential roles in neuropsychiatric disorders
Published in
Neuroscience Bulletin, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12264-014-1495-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chunyu Liu, Michael Chung

Abstract

Circadian rhythm alterations have been implicated in multiple neuropsychiatric disorders, particularly those of sleep, addiction, anxiety, and mood. Circadian rhythms are known to be maintained by a set of classic clock genes that form complex mutual and self-regulatory loops. While many other genes showing rhythmic expression have been identified by genome-wide studies, their roles in circadian regulation remain largely unknown. In attempts to directly connect circadian rhythms with neuropsychiatric disorders, genetic studies have identified gene mutations associated with several rare sleep disorders or sleep-related traits. Other than that, genetic studies of circadian genes in psychiatric disorders have had limited success. As an important mediator of environmental factors and regulators of circadian rhythms, the epigenetic system may hold the key to the etiology or pathology of psychiatric disorders, their subtypes or endophenotypes. Epigenomic regulation of the circadian system and the related changes have not been thoroughly explored in the context of neuropsychiatric disorders. We argue for systematic investigation of the circadian system, particularly epigenetic regulation, and its involvement in neuropsychiatric disorders to improve our understanding of human behavior and disease etiology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 149 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 14%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Master 14 9%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Other 33 21%
Unknown 32 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 14%
Neuroscience 20 13%
Psychology 19 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 10%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 37 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2016.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Neuroscience Bulletin
#227
of 763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,686
of 352,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroscience Bulletin
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 763 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.