↓ Skip to main content

A strongly polynomial minimum cost circulation algorithm

Overview of attention for article published in Combinatorica, September 1985
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
241 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
A strongly polynomial minimum cost circulation algorithm
Published in
Combinatorica, September 1985
DOI 10.1007/bf02579369
Authors

Éva Tardos

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Russia 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 32 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 20 56%
Mathematics 5 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 5 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2021.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Combinatorica
#64
of 271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,666
of 9,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Combinatorica
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 271 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them