↓ Skip to main content

日本語学習者の日本語漢字語彙処理のメ力ニズム

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Japanese Language Teaching, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
日本語学習者の日本語漢字語彙処理のメ力ニズム
Published in
Journal of Japanese Language Teaching, March 2017
DOI 10.20721/nihongokyoiku.146.0_49
Authors

邱 學瑾

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2023.
All research outputs
#17,350,971
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japanese Language Teaching
#154
of 280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,378
of 324,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japanese Language Teaching
#82
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 280 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.