↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of the phencyclidine-like discriminative stimulus effects of novel NMDA channel blockers in rats

Overview of attention for article published in Psychopharmacology, July 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of the phencyclidine-like discriminative stimulus effects of novel NMDA channel blockers in rats
Published in
Psychopharmacology, July 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00213-003-1527-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine L. Nicholson, Robert L. Balster

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 1 33%
Chemistry 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#2,227
of 5,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,524
of 52,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.