You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Early Ideas in Underground Coal Gasification and Their Evolution
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Energies, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.3390/en20200456 |
| Authors |
Alexander Klimenko |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Poland | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 65 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 13 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 23 | 34% |
| Energy | 11 | 16% |
| Chemical Engineering | 6 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2014.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Energies
#1,562
of 9,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,502
of 111,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Energies
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,186 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.