↓ Skip to main content

The Psychology of Esports: A Systematic Literature Review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gambling Studies, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
190 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
718 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The Psychology of Esports: A Systematic Literature Review
Published in
Journal of Gambling Studies, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10899-018-9763-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fanni Bányai, Mark D. Griffiths, Orsolya Király, Zsolt Demetrovics

Abstract

Recently, the skill involved in playing and mastering video games has led to the professionalization of the activity in the form of 'esports' (electronic sports). The aim of the present paper was to review the main topics of psychological interest about esports and then to examine the similarities of esports to professional and problem gambling. As a result of a systematic literature search, eight studies were identified that had investigated three topics: (1) the process of becoming an esport player, (2) the characteristics of esport players such as mental skills and motivations, and (3) the motivations of esport spectators. These findings draw attention to the new research field of professional video game playing and provides some preliminary insight into the psychology of esports players. The paper also examines the similarities between esport players and professional gamblers (and more specifically poker players). It is suggested that future research should focus on esport players' psychological vulnerability because some studies have begun to investigate the difference between problematic and professional gambling and this might provide insights into whether the playing of esports could also be potentially problematic for some players.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 718 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 718 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 99 14%
Student > Bachelor 98 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 8%
Researcher 45 6%
Lecturer 27 4%
Other 92 13%
Unknown 297 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 104 14%
Sports and Recreations 71 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 61 8%
Social Sciences 42 6%
Computer Science 28 4%
Other 106 15%
Unknown 306 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2020.
All research outputs
#5,544,937
of 25,712,965 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gambling Studies
#258
of 1,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,343
of 348,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gambling Studies
#10
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,712,965 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,000 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.