↓ Skip to main content

From quasispecies to quasispaces: coding and cooperation in chemical and electronic systems

Overview of attention for article published in European Biophysics Journal, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
From quasispecies to quasispaces: coding and cooperation in chemical and electronic systems
Published in
European Biophysics Journal, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00249-018-1284-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

John S. McCaskill

Abstract

This contribution addresses the physical roles of spatial structures, either externally imposed or generated through self-assembly, either passive or active, on the physical chemistry of evolution. Starting with simple diffusion in closed capillaries, a one-dimensional space, it covers eight aspects of experimental and theoretical research into the interaction of evolution with spatial structures: in various dimensions, including hitherto unexplored ones, spanning from externally defined physical spaces to actively tailored spaces, assembled by the evolving components themselves. As such, it contains some original research by the author as well as tracing how other insights grew over three decades out of the mentorship of Manfred Eigen in the 1980s. Much of the early interest in spatial structures centres on its role in stabilizing higher order cooperative structures involving the coevolution of different molecules, as the genetic coding system exemplifies. Modern nanotechnology enables the design and construction of genetically encoded variants of smart components that can actively control both the proliferation of molecules and the structuring of space. A key role for this article is to show the continuity in this line of enquiry, beginning with quasispecies and projecting to autonomous microparticles with electronic genomes able to form programmable quasispaces.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 25%
Student > Bachelor 3 25%
Other 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 17%
Engineering 2 17%
Chemistry 2 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2018.
All research outputs
#17,932,482
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from European Biophysics Journal
#375
of 491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,104
of 331,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Biophysics Journal
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 491 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.