↓ Skip to main content

Sensory Systems in Sawfishes. 1. The Ampullae of Lorenzini

Overview of attention for article published in Brain, Behavior and Evolution, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sensory Systems in Sawfishes. 1. The Ampullae of Lorenzini
Published in
Brain, Behavior and Evolution, August 2011
DOI 10.1159/000329515
Pubmed ID
Authors

B.E. Wueringer, S.C. Peverell, J. Seymour, L. Squire, S.M. Kajiura, S.P. Collin

Abstract

The distribution and density of the ampullary electroreceptors in the skin of elasmobranchs are influenced by the phylogeny and ecology of a species. Sensory maps were created for 4 species of pristid sawfish. Their ampullary pores were separated into pore fields based on their innervation and cluster formation. Ventrally, ampullary pores are located in 6 areas (5 in Pristis microdon), covering the rostrum and head to the gills. Dorsally, pores are located in 4 areas (3 in P. microdon), which cover the rostrum, head and may extend slightly onto the pectoral fins. In all species, the highest number of pores is found on the dorsal and ventral sides of the rostrum. The high densities of pores along the rostrum combined with the low densities around the mouth could indicate that sawfish use their rostrum to stun their prey before ingesting it, but this hypothesis remains to be tested. The directions of ampullary canals on the ventral side of the rostrum are species specific. P. microdon possesses the highest number of ampullary pores, which indicates that amongst the study species this species is an electroreception specialist. As such, juvenile P. microdon inhabit low-visibility freshwater habitats.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 62 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 23%
Student > Bachelor 12 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Student > Master 11 17%
Other 3 5%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 6 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 62%
Environmental Science 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 6 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,121,717
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Brain, Behavior and Evolution
#85
of 704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,379
of 130,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain, Behavior and Evolution
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.