| Title |
Atraumatic restorative treatment versus amalgam restoration longevity: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Oral Investigations, August 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00784-009-0335-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steffen Mickenautsch, Veerasamy Yengopal, Avijit Banerjee |
| Abstract |
The aim was to report on the longevity of restorations placed using the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach compared with that of equivalent placed amalgam restorations. Five databases were systematically searched for articles up to 16 March 2009. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 153 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 37 | 24% |
| Unknown | 34 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 99 | 63% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 2% |
| Psychology | 2 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 37 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2015.
All research outputs
#3,272,132
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Oral Investigations
#89
of 1,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,327
of 106,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Oral Investigations
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,400 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them