↓ Skip to main content

Phonotactic parasitoids and cricket song structure: An evaluation of alternative hypotheses

Overview of attention for article published in Evolutionary Ecology, May 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Phonotactic parasitoids and cricket song structure: An evaluation of alternative hypotheses
Published in
Evolutionary Ecology, May 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf01237681
Authors

John T. Rotenberry, Marlene Zuk, Leigh W. Simmons, Cassandra Hayes

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 4%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 45 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Master 5 10%
Professor 3 6%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 3 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 71%
Environmental Science 6 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Unknown 4 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2014.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Evolutionary Ecology
#291
of 704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,369
of 27,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolutionary Ecology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 27,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them