↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

A Multidisciplinary Approach on the Perioperative Antithrombotic Management of Patients With Coronary Stents Undergoing Surgery Surgery After Stenting 2

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
79 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
Title
A Multidisciplinary Approach on the Perioperative Antithrombotic Management of Patients With Coronary Stents Undergoing Surgery Surgery After Stenting 2
Published in
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, March 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.10.051
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roberta Rossini, Giuseppe Tarantini, Giuseppe Musumeci, Giulia Masiero, Emanuele Barbato, Paolo Calabrò, Davide Capodanno, Sergio Leonardi, Maddalena Lettino, Ugo Limbruno, Alberto Menozzi, U.O. Alfredo Marchese, Francesco Saia, Marco Valgimigli, Walter Ageno, Anna Falanga, Antonio Corcione, Alessandro Locatelli, Marco Montorsi, Diego Piazza, Andrea Stella, Antonio Bozzani, Alessandro Parolari, Roberto Carone, Dominick J. Angiolillo, Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology, Italian Society for the Study of Haemostasis and Thrombosis, Italian Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Italian Society of Surgery, Italian Society for Cardiac Surgery, Italian Society of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Italian Society of Urology, Italian Orthopaedic Society, Italian Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Italian Federation of Scientific Societies of Digestive System Diseases, Italian Society of Digestive Endoscopy, Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Italian Association of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Italian Society of Maxillofacial Surgery, Italian Society of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery and Aesthetics, Italian Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Italian Society of Neurosurgery, Italian Association of Hospital Pulmonologist, Italian Society of Periodontology, Italian Society of Ophthalmology, Italian Association of Hospital Otorhinolaryngologist, Italian Association of Hospital Surgeons, Association of Obstetricians Gynecologists Italian Hospital

Abstract

Perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy in patients treated with coronary stents undergoing surgery remains poorly defined. Importantly, surgery represents a common reason for premature treatment discontinuation, which is associated with an increased risk in mortality and major adverse cardiac events. However, maintaining antithrombotic therapy to minimize the incidence of perioperative ischemic complications may increase the risk of bleeding complications. Although guidelines provide some recommendations with respect to the perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy, these have been largely developed according to the thrombotic risk of the patient and a definition of the hemorrhagic risk specific to each surgical procedure, key to defining the trade-off between ischemia and bleeding, is not provided. These observations underscore the need for a multidisciplinary collaboration among cardiologists, anesthesiologists, hematologists and surgeons to reach this goal. The present document is an update on practical recommendations for standardizing management of antithrombotic therapy management in patients treated with coronary stents (Surgery After Stenting 2) in various types of surgery according to the predicted individual risk of thrombotic complications against the anticipated risk of surgical bleeding complications. Cardiologists defined the thrombotic risk using a "combined ischemic risk" approach, while surgeons classified surgeries according to their inherent hemorrhagic risk. Finally, a multidisciplinary agreement on the most appropriate antithrombotic treatment regimen in the perioperative phase was reached for each surgical procedure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 136 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 20 15%
Student > Master 12 9%
Researcher 10 7%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 52 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 57 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2022.
All research outputs
#940,545
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#312
of 4,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,908
of 345,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#7
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.