↓ Skip to main content

Borrowing contextual inflection: evidence from northern Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Morphology, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 100)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Borrowing contextual inflection: evidence from northern Australia
Published in
Morphology, June 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11525-010-9163-4
Authors

Felicity Meakins

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 25%
Researcher 3 19%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 11 69%
Social Sciences 2 13%
Mathematics 1 6%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2014.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Morphology
#20
of 100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,112
of 96,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Morphology
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.