↓ Skip to main content

Amyloid fibrils from the viewpoint of protein folding

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, March 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
22 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Amyloid fibrils from the viewpoint of protein folding
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, March 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00018-003-3264-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Ohnishi, K. Takano

Abstract

In amyloid related diseases, proteins form fibrillar aggregates with highly ordered beta-sheet structure regardless of their native conformations. Formation of such amyloid fibrils can be reproducible in vitro using isolated proteins/peptides, suggesting that amyloid fibril formation takes place as a result of protein conformational change. In vitro studies revealed that perturbation of the native structure is important for the fibril formation, and it is suggested that the mechanisms of amyloid fibril formation share the mechanisms of protein folding. In particular, amyloid fibril formation is similar to one of the common features of proteins, i.e. amorphous aggregation upon partial unfolding, which is likely driven by hydrophobic interactions through exposed protein interior. However, these molecular associations are distinct phenomena, and identifying factors that lead to amyloid fibril formation would precede our understanding of the mechanisms of amyloid fibrillization. The necessity of understanding the nature of protein denatured states is also suggested.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 3%
United States 3 2%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 176 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 25%
Student > Master 31 16%
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Researcher 23 12%
Other 9 5%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 26 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 16%
Chemistry 26 14%
Physics and Astronomy 13 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 6%
Other 37 19%
Unknown 29 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2021.
All research outputs
#7,845,540
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#1,655
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,576
of 55,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#10
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 55,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.