↓ Skip to main content

The “Pectoral-Gap Phenomenon”: A Hypothesis on Origin and Mechanism

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
The “Pectoral-Gap Phenomenon”: A Hypothesis on Origin and Mechanism
Published in
Sports Medicine, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40279-018-0886-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sebastian Schnaubelt, Georgios Neophytou, Bernhard Richter, Hans Domanovits, Alexander Niessner, Patrick Sulzgruber

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 40%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 2 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2019.
All research outputs
#6,801,079
of 23,954,951 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#2,028
of 2,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,492
of 335,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#56
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,954,951 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,784 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.