↓ Skip to main content

Characterization and Toxicity of Amanita cokeri Extract

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chemical Ecology, February 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Characterization and Toxicity of Amanita cokeri Extract
Published in
Journal of Chemical Ecology, February 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1017986108720
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dennis C. Drehmel, William Scott Chilton

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 27%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Professor 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 73%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Environmental Science 1 9%
Unknown 1 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#686
of 2,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,341
of 132,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.