↓ Skip to main content

Gene Ontology annotations at SGD: new data sources and annotation methods

Overview of attention for article published in Nucleic Acids Research, December 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
220 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gene Ontology annotations at SGD: new data sources and annotation methods
Published in
Nucleic Acids Research, December 2007
DOI 10.1093/nar/gkm909
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eurie L. Hong, Rama Balakrishnan, Qing Dong, Karen R. Christie, Julie Park, Gail Binkley, Maria C. Costanzo, Selina S. Dwight, Stacia R. Engel, Dianna G. Fisk, Jodi E. Hirschman, Benjamin C. Hitz, Cynthia J. Krieger, Michael S. Livstone, Stuart R. Miyasato, Robert S. Nash, Rose Oughtred, Marek S. Skrzypek, Shuai Weng, Edith D. Wong, Kathy K. Zhu, Kara Dolinski, David Botstein, J. Michael Cherry

Abstract

The Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD; http://www.yeastgenome.org/) collects and organizes biological information about the chromosomal features and gene products of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Although published data from traditional experimental methods are the primary sources of evidence supporting Gene Ontology (GO) annotations for a gene product, high-throughput experiments and computational predictions can also provide valuable insights in the absence of an extensive body of literature. Therefore, GO annotations available at SGD now include high-throughput data as well as computational predictions provided by the GO Annotation Project (GOA UniProt; http://www.ebi.ac.uk/GOA/). Because the annotation method used to assign GO annotations varies by data source, GO resources at SGD have been modified to distinguish data sources and annotation methods. In addition to providing information for genes that have not been experimentally characterized, GO annotations from independent sources can be compared to those made by SGD to help keep the literature-based GO annotations current.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 8%
Portugal 2 2%
Netherlands 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Chile 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 82 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 25%
Researcher 23 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 10%
Other 6 6%
Student > Master 6 6%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 14 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 43%
Computer Science 18 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 <1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 16 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2011.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Nucleic Acids Research
#12,415
of 26,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,623
of 155,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nucleic Acids Research
#77
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.