| Title |
Key drivers of effectiveness in small marine protected areas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-018-1532-z |
| Authors |
John W. Turnbull, Yasmina Shah Esmaeili, Graeme F. Clark, Will F. Figueira, Emma L. Johnston, Renata Ferrari |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 11 | 33% |
| Fiji | 2 | 6% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 61% |
| Scientists | 11 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 118 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 29 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 37 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 32 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,691,047
of 24,195,945 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#235
of 2,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,642
of 335,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#4
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,195,945 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,348 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.