| Title |
On the acyclic subgraph polytope
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Mathematical Programming, September 1985
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01582009 |
| Authors |
Martin Grötschel, Michael Jünger, Gerhard Reinelt |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 21 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 17% |
| Professor | 3 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 9 | 39% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 13% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2022.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Mathematical Programming
#164
of 801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,788
of 9,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mathematical Programming
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 801 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them