↓ Skip to main content

Cymothoidae and Aegidae (Crustacea, Isopoda) from Algeria

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Parasitologica, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Cymothoidae and Aegidae (Crustacea, Isopoda) from Algeria
Published in
Acta Parasitologica, June 2008
DOI 10.2478/s11686-008-0033-8
Authors

Zouhir Ramdane, Jean-Paul Trilles

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Other 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 61%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 6%
Unknown 4 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Acta Parasitologica
#87
of 735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,561
of 95,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Parasitologica
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 735 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.