| Title |
Electrophysiological Response and Attraction of Emerald Ash Borer to Green Leaf Volatiles (GLVs) Emitted by Host Foliage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Chemical Ecology, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10886-008-9514-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter de Groot, Gary G. Grant, Therese M. Poland, Roger Scharbach, Linda Buchan, Reginald W. Nott, Linda Macdonald, Doug Pitt |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Egypt | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 58 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 34% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 62% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 13 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2016.
All research outputs
#4,757,284
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#301
of 2,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,855
of 82,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.