↓ Skip to main content

The use of the „studentized range” in connection with an analysis of variance

Overview of attention for article published in Euphytica, July 1952
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
537 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
The use of the „studentized range” in connection with an analysis of variance
Published in
Euphytica, July 1952
DOI 10.1007/bf01908269
Authors

M. Keuls

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 21%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 55%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 6%
Mathematics 2 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 8 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,599,917
of 23,172,045 outputs
Outputs from Euphytica
#331
of 1,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132
of 733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Euphytica
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,172,045 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them