| Title |
Flowfield characterisation in the wake of a low-velocity heated sphere anemometer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Experiments in Fluids, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00348-001-0403-6 |
| Authors |
A. M. Olim, M. L. Riethmuller, M. C. Gameiro da Silva |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 43% |
| Researcher | 3 | 43% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 6 | 86% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Experiments in Fluids
#155
of 1,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,720
of 221,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experiments in Fluids
#5
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,278 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.