| Title |
Pick your carats: nanoparticles of gold–silver–copper alloy produced in vivo
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanoparticle Research, January 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11051-006-9198-y |
| Authors |
R. G. Haverkamp, A. T. Marshall, D. van Agterveld |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 4 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 115 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 28% |
| Researcher | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 32 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 19% |
| Chemistry | 16 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 8% |
| Materials Science | 10 | 8% |
| Engineering | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 34 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2018.
All research outputs
#3,272,132
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#55
of 903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,880
of 158,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 903 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them