↓ Skip to main content

Concurrent Versus Sequential Chemoradiation Therapy in Completely Resected Pathologic N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Propensity-Matched Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Concurrent Versus Sequential Chemoradiation Therapy in Completely Resected Pathologic N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Propensity-Matched Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, February 2018
DOI 10.1245/s10434-018-6399-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy C. Moreno, Waqar Haque, Vivek Verma, Penny Fang, Steven H. Lin

Abstract

Following complete resection of pN2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), national guidelines recommend either sequential (sCRT) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT). This is the largest study to date evaluating survival between both approaches. In sCRT patients, sequencing 'chemotherapy first' versus 'radiotherapy first' was also addressed. The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried for patients with primary NSCLC undergoing surgery (without neoadjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy), pN2 disease with negative surgical margins, and receiving postoperative CRT. Multivariable logistic regression ascertained factors associated with cCRT administration. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS), and Cox proportional hazards modeling determined variables associated with OS. Propensity matching was performed to address group imbalances and indication biases. Of 1924 total patients, 1115 (58%) received sCRT and 809 (42%) underwent cCRT. Median OS in the sCRT and cCRT cohorts was 53 months versus 37 months (p < 0.001); differences persisted following propensity matching (p = 0.002). In the sCRT population, there was a trend for higher OS in the 'chemotherapy first' group, relative to 'radiotherapy first' (55 vs. 44 months, p = 0.079), but there were no statistically apparent differences following propensity matching (p = 0.302). For completely resected pN2 NSCLC, delivering adjuvant sCRT was associated with improved survival over cCRT. Toxicity-related factors may help to explain these results but need to be better addressed in further investigations. Differential sequencing of sCRT did not appear to affect survival.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 23%
Student > Postgraduate 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Unknown 5 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2018.
All research outputs
#18,589,103
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#5,046
of 6,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,746
of 330,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#89
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.