↓ Skip to main content

Erratum: Prostate-specific antigen velocity in a prospective prostate cancer screening study of men with genetic predisposition

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Cancer, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum: Prostate-specific antigen velocity in a prospective prostate cancer screening study of men with genetic predisposition
Published in
British Journal of Cancer, March 2018
DOI 10.1038/bjc.2018.11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christos Mikropoulos, Christina G Hutten Selkirk, Sibel Saya, Elizabeth Bancroft, Emily Vertosick, Tokhir Dadaev, Charles Brendler, Elizabeth Page, Alexander Dias, D Gareth Evans, Jeanette Rothwell, Lovise Maehle, Karol Axcrona, Kate Richardson, Diana Eccles, Thomas Jensen, Palle J Osther, Christi J van Asperen, Hans Vasen, Lambertus A Kiemeney, Janneke Ringelberg, Cezary Cybulski, Dominika Wokolorczyk, Rachel Hart, Wayne Glover, Jimmy Lam, Louise Taylor, Monica Salinas, Lidia Feliubadaló, Rogier Oldenburg, Ruben Cremers, Gerald Verhaegh, Wendy A van Zelst-Stams, Jan C Oosterwijk, Jackie Cook, Derek J Rosario, Saundra S Buys, Tom Conner, Susan Domchek, Jacquelyn Powers, Margreet G E M Ausems, Manuel R Teixeira, Sofia Maia, Louise Izatt, Rita Schmutzler, Kerstin Rhiem, William D Foulkes, Talia Boshari, Rosemarie Davidson, Marielle Ruijs, Apollonia T J M Helderman-van den Enden, Lesley Andrews, Lisa Walker, Katie Snape, Alex Henderson, Irene Jobson, Geoffrey J Lindeman, Annelie Liljegren, Marion Harris, Muriel A Adank, Judy Kirk, Amy Taylor, Rachel Susman, Rakefet Chen-Shtoyerman, Nicholas Pachter, Allan Spigelman, Lucy Side, Janez Zgajnar, Josefina Mora, Carole Brewer, Neus Gadea, Angela F Brady, David Gallagher, Theo van Os, Alan Donaldson, Vigdis Stefansdottir, Julian Barwell, Paul A James, Declan Murphy, Eitan Friedman, Nicola Nicolai, Lynn Greenhalgh, Elias Obeid, Vedang Murthy, Lucia Copakova, John McGrath, Soo-Hwang Teo, Sara Strom, Karin Kast, Daniel A Leongamornlert, Anthony Chamberlain, Jenny Pope, Anna C Newlin, Neil Aaronson, Audrey Ardern-Jones, Chris Bangma, Elena Castro, David Dearnaley, Jorunn Eyfjord, Alison Falconer, Christopher S Foster, Henrik Gronberg, Freddie C Hamdy, Oskar Johannsson, Vincent Khoo, Jan Lubinski, Eli Marie Grindedal, Joanne McKinley, Kylie Shackleton, Anita V Mitra, Clare Moynihan, Gad Rennert, Mohnish Suri, Karen Tricker, Sue Moss, Zsofia Kote-Jarai, Andrew Vickers, Hans Lilja, Brian T Helfand, Rosalind A Eeles

Abstract

This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.429.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2018.
All research outputs
#13,755,856
of 23,321,213 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#8,767
of 10,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,417
of 332,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#80
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,321,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.