↓ Skip to main content

Brief Report: The Effects of Tomatis Sound Therapy on Language in Children with Autism

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Brief Report: The Effects of Tomatis Sound Therapy on Language in Children with Autism
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10803-007-0413-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Blythe A. Corbett, Kathryn Shickman, Emilio Ferrer

Abstract

Due to the myriad of problems associated with autism, parents often consider alternative treatments. The investigation was undertaken to determine the effects of the Tomatis Method on language skills in children with autism utilizing a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design. The results indicated that although the majority of the children demonstrated general improvement in language over the course of the study, it did not appear to be related to the treatment condition. The percent change for Group 1 (Placebo/Treatment) for treatment was 17.41%, and placebo was 24.84%. Group 2 (Treatment/Placebo) showed -3.98% change for treatment and 14.15% change for placebo. The results reflect a lack of improvement in language using the Tomatis Method for children with autism.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 4 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 166 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 15%
Researcher 24 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 14%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Professor 10 6%
Other 35 20%
Unknown 37 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 55 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 9%
Social Sciences 10 6%
Arts and Humanities 7 4%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 42 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,176,269
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,699
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,732
of 69,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.