↓ Skip to main content

A report of two families with sarcosinaemia in Hong Kong and revisiting the pathogenetic potential of hypersarcosinaemia.

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore, August 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A report of two families with sarcosinaemia in Hong Kong and revisiting the pathogenetic potential of hypersarcosinaemia.
Published in
Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore, August 2006
DOI 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.v35n8p582
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shing-Yan Lee, Kwok-Yin Chan, Albert YW Chan, Chi-Kong Lai

Abstract

Sarcosinaemia is a rare metabolic disorder which has not been reported in Asia.

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2023.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore
#95
of 447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,011
of 90,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 447 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them