↓ Skip to main content

Biomechanical Analysis of the Effect of Orthotic Shoe Inserts

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
Title
Biomechanical Analysis of the Effect of Orthotic Shoe Inserts
Published in
Sports Medicine, September 2012
DOI 10.2165/00007256-200029060-00005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohsen Razeghi, Mark Edward Batt

Abstract

Physical activity is increasingly recognised as an important component of primary disease prevention. Overuse injuries are common sequelae of exercise and sporting activities in general, and of running in particular, frequently resulting in cessation of activity. It has been proposed that there is a link between foot shape, foot function and the occurrence of injury. As a means of treatment and prevention of further injury, orthoses and shoe inserts are widely prescribed in the belief that they can alter the pattern of lower extremity joints' alignment and movement. Although this is an assumption widely made in the treatment of many joint conditions, the manner through which this treatment could be effective is not clear. This article aims to examine the literature to gain an improved understanding of the present state of knowledge regarding the effect of foot shape and orthotic use on foot kinematic and plantar pressure characteristics. The effects of foot type on the occurrence of lower limb injury during sporting activities and different aspects of biomechanics are reviewed, and the effects of applying orthoses on injury treatment and prevention and on various aspects of biomechanics of the lower limb joints are discussed. Further research is required, firstly to establish the casual effect of foot type and function on the risk of lower extremity overuse injury, and secondly to document the specific effect of orthotic therapy on injury treatment and prevention. Specifically, more prospective studies are necessary to investigate the long term effect of orthotic intervention.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 138 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 15%
Researcher 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Lecturer 9 6%
Other 36 24%
Unknown 21 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 44 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 20%
Engineering 14 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 7%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 28 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2014.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#2,277
of 2,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,033
of 190,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#485
of 761 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 761 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.