| Title |
A field guide to the caecilians of the Western Ghats, India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings: Plant Sciences, March 1998
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02728526 |
| Authors |
Gopalakrishna Bhatta |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 4 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 21% |
| Researcher | 18 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 12 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 64% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings: Plant Sciences
#242
of 975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,078
of 31,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings: Plant Sciences
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 975 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 31,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them