You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Metamodeling and mapping of nitrate flux in the unsaturated zone and groundwater, Wisconsin, USA
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Hydrology, April 2018
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.02.029 |
Authors |
Bernard T. Nolan, Christopher T. Green, Paul F. Juckem, Lixia Liao, James E. Reddy |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 90 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 20 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 20% |
Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 4% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 4% |
Other | 12 | 13% |
Unknown | 21 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 17 | 19% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 13% |
Engineering | 10 | 11% |
Computer Science | 5 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Unknown | 27 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2021.
All research outputs
#8,538,940
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hydrology
#1,405
of 8,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,115
of 343,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hydrology
#20
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,697 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.