↓ Skip to main content

Shark Tagging: A Review Of Conventional Methods and Studies

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Biology of Fishes, February 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
169 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
370 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Shark Tagging: A Review Of Conventional Methods and Studies
Published in
Environmental Biology of Fishes, February 2001
DOI 10.1023/a:1007679303082
Authors

Nancy E. Kohler, Patricia A. Turner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 370 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Mozambique 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Cuba 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 8 2%
Unknown 349 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 81 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 18%
Student > Master 54 15%
Student > Bachelor 44 12%
Student > Postgraduate 19 5%
Other 50 14%
Unknown 54 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 207 56%
Environmental Science 56 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 <1%
Other 17 5%
Unknown 72 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2012.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Biology of Fishes
#493
of 1,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,231
of 113,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Biology of Fishes
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,763 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.