| Title |
Social Stories™ for Children with Disabilities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, April 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10803-006-0086-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Georgina Reynhout, Mark Carter |
| Abstract |
A review of the empirical research literature on Social Stories is presented, including a descriptive review and single-subject meta-analysis of appropriate studies. Examination of data suggests the effects of Social Stories are highly variable. Interpretations of extant studies are frequently confounded by inadequate participant description and the use of Social Stories in combination with other interventions. It is unclear whether particular components of Social Stories are central to their efficacy. Data on maintenance and generalization are also limited. Social Stories stand as a promising intervention, being relatively straightforward and efficient to implement with application to a wide range of behaviors. Further research is needed to determine the exact nature of their contribution and the components critical to their efficacy. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 201 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 42 | 20% |
| Unknown | 43 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 58 | 28% |
| Social Sciences | 35 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 7% |
| Linguistics | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Unknown | 54 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,926,100
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2,861
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,026
of 67,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#18
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.