↓ Skip to main content

O'Donoghue's triad: magnetic resonance imaging evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Skeletal Radiology, November 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
O'Donoghue's triad: magnetic resonance imaging evidence
Published in
Skeletal Radiology, November 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf02580384
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ronald B. Staron, Nogah Haramati, Frieda Feldman, Howard A. Kiernan, H. Charles Pfaff, Stuart J. Rubin, Alicia Zwass

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Other 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 7 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 33%
Sports and Recreations 3 13%
Unspecified 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 8 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2010.
All research outputs
#8,515,480
of 25,388,229 outputs
Outputs from Skeletal Radiology
#481
of 1,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,560
of 21,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Skeletal Radiology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,229 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 21,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.