↓ Skip to main content

Ultra-thin enzymatic liquid membrane for CO2 separation and capture

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
22 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ultra-thin enzymatic liquid membrane for CO2 separation and capture
Published in
Nature Communications, March 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-03285-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yaqin Fu, Ying-Bing Jiang, Darren Dunphy, Haifeng Xiong, Eric Coker, Stanley S. Chou, Hongxia Zhang, Juan M. Vanegas, Jonas G. Croissant, Joseph L. Cecchi, Susan B. Rempe, C. Jeffrey Brinker

Abstract

The limited flux and selectivities of current carbon dioxide membranes and the high costs associated with conventional absorption-based CO2 sequestration call for alternative CO2 separation approaches. Here we describe an enzymatically active, ultra-thin, biomimetic membrane enabling CO2 capture and separation under ambient pressure and temperature conditions. The membrane comprises a ~18-nm-thick close-packed array of 8 nm diameter hydrophilic pores that stabilize water by capillary condensation and precisely accommodate the metalloenzyme carbonic anhydrase (CA). CA catalyzes the rapid interconversion of CO2 and water into carbonic acid. By minimizing diffusional constraints, stabilizing and concentrating CA within the nanopore array to a concentration 10× greater than achievable in solution, our enzymatic liquid membrane separates CO2 at room temperature and atmospheric pressure at a rate of 2600 GPU with CO2/N2 and CO2/H2 selectivities as high as 788 and 1500, respectively, the highest combined flux and selectivity yet reported for ambient condition operation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 147 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 22%
Student > Master 23 16%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 37 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 28 19%
Chemistry 24 16%
Engineering 12 8%
Materials Science 9 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 50 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2022.
All research outputs
#480,939
of 23,758,679 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#8,295
of 49,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,007
of 333,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#245
of 1,199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,758,679 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 49,576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.