↓ Skip to main content

Principle and analytical applications of resonance lonization mass spectrometry

Overview of attention for article published in Microchimica Acta, May 1989
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Principle and analytical applications of resonance lonization mass spectrometry
Published in
Microchimica Acta, May 1989
DOI 10.1007/bf01244676
Authors

Hubertus Rimke, G�nter Herrmann, Marita Mang, Christoph M�hleck, Joachim Riegel, Peter Sattelberger, Norbert Trautmann, Friedhelm Ames, Hans -J�rgen Kluge, Ernst -Wilhelm Otten, Dieter Rehklau, Wolfgang Ruster, Franz Scheerer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 2 40%
Decision Sciences 1 20%
Chemical Engineering 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2019.
All research outputs
#7,547,578
of 23,026,672 outputs
Outputs from Microchimica Acta
#192
of 1,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,106
of 14,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microchimica Acta
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,026,672 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,401 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them