| Title |
Sleep-Inducing Properties of DSIP Analogs: Structural and Functional Relationships
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biology Bulletin, July 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1016679208936 |
| Authors |
V. M. Koval'zon |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 67% |
| Other | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 1 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 33% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2010.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Biology Bulletin
#38
of 250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,991
of 40,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Bulletin
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 250 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them